This is another 6/13/98 public reply to Steve Adams where I address some of his frivilious allegations and thank him for his public admission regarding his efforts to use the malicious spss.com FAQ to obstruct my attempts to have child porn investigated by a US Senator. The lines with > are from Steve Adams post 6luih4$kc6@Mercury.mcs.net The lines with >> are from on of my posts that he quoted. From steve.winter@prime.org Sat Jun 13 17:02:55 1998 From: steve.winter@prime.org (Rev. Steve Winter) Subject: Re: Catholics Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 21:02:55 GMT References: <355D9A22.3479@teleport.com> <6jq3rb$1mb@stratus.CAM.ORG> <35660E73.6E56@teleport.com> <6k6euv$l5h@Mercury.mcs.net> <6kqr98$buq$1@news2.ispnews.com> <6ljt7i$cc6$1@supernews.com> <6luih4$kc6@Mercury.mcs.net> Reply-To: steve@prime.org -------- sadams@MCS.COM (Steve Adams) spake thusly and wrote: >And Mr. Winter himself has admitted that the FAQ was published by me. >Anyone can see his admission on DejaNews (link provided in the FAQ). >According to my attorney, Mr. Winter now has no case at all against >SPSS, *and* is possibly in violation of Copyright law by asserting >that SPSS is the publisher when he knows they are not. At least the first seven releases of the spss.com FAQ were published by the admin of spss.com using the resources and reputation of spss.com. Mr. Adams will now claim copyright of a work first published using the resources of spss.com. >>in an ongoing effort to destroy my business and to aid and abet others in >>campaigns of criminal and other forms of harassment against me. > >Nope. It's you who are harassing the net. That's why the FAQ. Mr Adams considers my Bible publishing "harassing the net" and justification for his malicious actions, yet somehow the obscenity and pornography on the internet are not cause for alarm. >>I have one refutation of the malicious spss.com FAQ at >>http://www.prime.org/spss.html > >First of all, it's nearly two years old. The latest version, with all >of the updates is Isn't it interesting how the claims of the FAQ have changed so dramatically, which is further proof of its libelous nature and intent. >Secondly, anyone who looks at it will see that you refute nothing! Seems to cause you some concern, enough to threaten my ISP. >>Mr. Adams has also even boasted regarding the use of the spss.com FAQ to >>attempt to interfere with my efforts to have child porn investigated by a US >>Senator. > >The FAQ, which is my work, and my work only, and has been identified as >such, and alwayws included a disclaimer to that effect, was sent to >Sentator Helms along with a letter which explained that Mr. Winter's >concern with pornography ONLY developed when his accounts were cancelled >because of his abuse. Thank you for that clear admission regarding your efforts to interfere with my attempts to have publishers of child porn investigated by a US Senator. See what I mean about these false christian filth like Steve Adams, folks. The publishing that exposes him as a sham fake is "harassing the net" while child porn publishing is just fine and should not be investigated as long as the ISPs agreed to breach their contract with Steve Winter and censor him. Rev. Steve Winter -- -={ PreRapture BBS 919-***-**** 33600bps / Telnet to PRIME.ORG }=- http://www.prime.org Home of the PRIME Christian Network Are the false christians pitching fits because I call them names, or because I am proving my allegations from their own Bibles? (Check the web site for info as 3 god cults embrace canine morals.)